<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Education is not a cure for inequality or poverty</title>
	<link>https://fguide.org/?p=95</link>
	<description>News, outrage, euphoria, etc from the Center for Popular Economics</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>https://fguide.org/?p=95#comment-6281</link>
		<author>rob</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://fguide.org/?p=95#comment-6281</guid>
					<description>Did the abolition of slavery reduce inequity or poverty?  Of course it did.  

This country has some suburban school districts spending twice as much per pupil as there urban counterparts.  Neither have the liberal arts education of private schools.

Liberal Arts are the arts of a free person.  Is it any wonder the extremely wealthy send their children?  If a child in the ghetto went to Andover or Exeter might that not level the playing field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did the abolition of slavery reduce inequity or poverty?  Of course it did.  </p>
<p>This country has some suburban school districts spending twice as much per pupil as there urban counterparts.  Neither have the liberal arts education of private schools.</p>
<p>Liberal Arts are the arts of a free person.  Is it any wonder the extremely wealthy send their children?  If a child in the ghetto went to Andover or Exeter might that not level the playing field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
